NOURNEWS - For more than two decades, the United States and the West have pursued policies that, while floating between "confrontation and cooperation," have proven to be ineffective.
The arrangement of methods, programs and measures of Western countries shows that, despite the great costs that the insistence on implementing these policies has imposed on the Iranian nation, the international system and its implementing countries, the presumption governing Western negotiations and political actions has remained unchanged.
Although the Zionist regime has an active tool in this field, due to the overactive behavior of some extremist officials of this regime, in many cases, games based on the so-called soft behaviors of the United States and Western countries to put pressure on Iran has been ruined by Tel Aviv.
In the meantime, in the face of the exorbitant costs that the West has so far paid, in the general sense, for the Zionist regime's interventions in the Western decision-making system, it has failed to be able to benefit from the continued supporting of the regime that is known for its evils such as evil, human rights violations, occupation, assassination, murder, violation of UN resolutions in the world.
Some reputable American media these days and in a situation where the atmosphere of negotiations between Iran and the P4+1 countries is not suitable, while reviewing the destructive role of the Zionist regime in shaping the current situation, has reviewed the relations between the US and Iran in recent decades.
Recognition of facts such as the United States' insistence on continuing old failed strategies and the loss of important opportunities caused by misunderstandings of external origin are among the axes seen in the analytical notes of the American media.
Contradictory and skeptical behavior of American officials, which in turn and in a reciprocal reaction has led to more violent behavior of Iranians is also one of the issues that can be seen in media analysis.
It is clear that Tehran's pursuit of the negotiation process as a continuation of the diplomatic and legal solution to achieve Iran's legitimate rights based on a consensus strategy has always been emphasized, but this peaceful and rational effort in a world where analysts interpret benevolence as a retreat, will not be effective without relying on more serious strategies.
Unfortunately, at various times, the West has not only benefited from Iran's goodwill and sincere cooperation with international institutions to resolve artificial misunderstandings, but has also taken a double standard each time to increase illegal pressure to impose its political will.
Today, even Iran's enemies acknowledge the fact that, despite the imposition of oppressive sanctions, Iran's peaceful nuclear program is advancing at a remarkable pace, and sanctions have failed to have the slightest mitigating effect on the peaceful programs that Westerners mistakenly express concern about it.
The current situation can be analyzed from the perspective of two hypotheses;
If the West is really concerned about the progress of Iran's peaceful nuclear program, it can use the opportunity provided by Iran to address these concerns within the framework of previous agreements and not fall prey to misunderstandings that some evil actors seek to create.
If the first hypothesis is not true, it must be admitted that the set of statements and concerns that are made about Iran's peaceful nuclear program is merely an excuse to put pressure on this country to impose the political will of the West on Iran.
In this case, too, the United States and the West must have the courage to take responsibility for their inhumane actions in imposing illegal economic sanctions on Iran, and to recognize that every country has the right to use all legitimate means to defend its independence and identity.
The reaction of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the political report of the Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency is considered a natural step against the abuse of Iran's good faith and will.
Although the United States emphasizes the separation of the Vienna negotiation process from interactions between Iran and the IAEA, it is clear that Western countries, in an action whose failure is already clear, are seeking to use the IAEA as a tool to gain concessions in the Vienna talks and impose conditions on Iran that its acceptance by this country means accepting a completely unilateral and ineffective agreement.
BY: Pooya Mirzaei
NOURNEWS