News ID : 81417
Publish Date : 11/27/2021 5:48:14 AM
Repetition of US military bluffs on the eve of nuclear negotiations


Repetition of US military bluffs on the eve of nuclear negotiations

The US government continues to insist on permanent threat and pressure, despite testing Iran's will to resist any coercion or extravagance.

NOURNEWS - With only a few days left until the start of new talks between Iran and the P4 + 1 on November 29, the American psychological operations machine is at its highest level testing various scenarios for Iran to surrender to their extravagances.

While Rafael Grossi, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), came to Tehran on Tuesday to meet with the head of the Atomic Energy Organization and the foreign minister after several political and illegal remarks against Iran, the Americans tried to do so, turning the travel into a tool to create a new psychological atmosphere against Iran.

After his visit to Tehran, Grossi spoke in Vienna on Wednesday with constructive, accurate and professional reading of talks with Iranian officials about some unfinished issues between Iran and the IAEA.

This ambiguous statement was enough to make the Western media believe that his talks in Tehran had failed.

The presentation of such a picture of the IAEA Director General's one-day visit to Tehran took place just a few days before the start of a new round of talks in Vienna with the aim of putting Iranian negotiators under psychological pressure and the specter of a US military threat dominating the negotiations.

In this regard; The former US National Security Adviser said in an analysis; The Vienna talks have not been successful due to the negative outcome of Grossi's visit.
At the same time, Gen. Kenneth Mackenzie, commander of the Centcom terrorists, said; In case of failure, the forces are ready for the military option.

in the meantime; "Robert Mali," the White House special envoy for Iran, who has always tried to be more lenient, said in a very threatening statement; If Iran comes close to building an atomic bomb, the United States will not sit idle.

This tactic of the Americans, of course, is unprecedented, and they always try to strengthen the levers of their pressure on our country on the eve of negotiations with threatening literature, so that they may achieve their goals.

The point, however, is that what the Americans refer to as the success of the negotiations is nothing but the absolute surrender of Iran to their extravagances, whereas if Iran had built itself to surrender to Western pressure, it would not have paid so much for resistance.

On the other hand; The Americans are still trying to assert their superiority and scare Iran that their situation, at least in West Asia, is so turbulent that in just this short time, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin and Mackenzie, the head of CENTCOM, have traveled to the region several times. They have tried to calm down their soldiers and worried forces in the area.

By traveling to the region, Robert Mali actually sought to reassure US regional mercenaries about the White House's political and military support.

What is certain is that the precarious situation in the United States in West Asia is not at all the same as threats and bigotry against Iran and the axis of resistance, and White House officials, knowing this, are only trying to advance their goals by repeating hollow military bluffs and using psychological operations and persuading Iran to surrender.

On the eve of the talks on lifting the illegal sanctions, Iran has clearly stated its principled positions to the negotiating parties, and in the talks held before the talks with the European parties, China and Russia, stressed the need to take joint measures to reach an agreement on lifting the illegal sanctions.

The US government continues to insist on continuing the threat and pressure, despite testing Iran's will to resist any coercion or extravagance.

If this behavior of the United States is somehow using the tactics of psychological operations on the eve of negotiations, it will not naturally have the desired result for Washington.

But if the United States uses these methods to justify its illegal actions in withdrawing from JCPOA, violating UNSCR 2231 and refusing to fulfill its obligations, and has taken the approach of fleeing forward, it should know that these statements and actions can in no way prevent this country from responding to the breach of an international agreement backed by a UN resolution.
BY: Mohammad Ghaderi


first name & last name