NOURNEWS - A few days ago, Benny Gantz, Defense Minister of Israel, spoke again about the danger of Iranian drones for the security of the region.
This is the second time in recent months that Zionist officials have spoken about Iran's drone capability, portraying it as a security threat to Iran's neighbors in West Asia.
Earlier, on September 24, the US-based National Interest reported that the Ethiopian government had used Migratory 6 drones in its civil war against the insurgents, and that in a military operation, Iranian drones had fired a T-72 Tigray insurgent tank with a vertical missile.
In a similar report, the Times of Israel expressed concern about the expansion of the Iranian drone market and its offensive capabilities.
Over the past year, Zionist and Western officials have used the language of terror to try to present Iran's UAV industry alongside Iran's missile capability as a potential security threat to the security of the West Asian region and to open a new security case for the Iranian UAV project.
A few weeks after Biden won the US presidential election, Thomas Friedman the famous New York Times columnist warned Biden in his weekly editorial about Iran's military might.
According to Friedman, the main danger for the countries of the region (meaning Saudi Arabia, the UAE and the Zionist regime) is not a nuclear Iran, but an Iran that has thousands of precision-guided missiles, the missiles and drones that Iran provided to the Yemeni Ansarullah movement, through which the Middle East's Pearl Harbor was formed (attacking Aramco's oil facilities).
As a result, Friedman suggests that Biden prioritize resolving the Iranian missile issue in order to resume negotiations with Iran.
After that, the Zionists, along with some American writers and politicians, tried to reopen a new case regarding Iran's drone capability.
To describe precisely; Westerners have shown in recent years that their main strategy against the Islamic Republic of Iran is not to try to reduce misunderstandings and problems in between, but to reopen new security files in order to isolate Iran.
Iran's defense strategy, meanwhile, is in response to long-standing Western sanctions on modernization of defense equipment and the constant threats by the United States and the Zionist regime to attack Iran and seek to change its political structure.
The history of the last two decades reminds us that the efforts of the United States and the Zionists are to create a long-term security-building process against Iran, in such a way that they can limit Iran to a geopolitical area, which, of course, has failed.
On the eve of the resumption of the Vienna talks, the reopening of a new case against Iran's legitimate defense will not only contribute to the negotiation process but also will be destructive.
The experience of recent years also reminds us that the United States, along with the Zionists, is trying to put Iran in a long-term bargaining process in order to find leverage for the legitimacy of economic sanctions.
This is precisely why the defense capability of Iran is not negotiable at all.
BY: Pooya Mirzaei
NOURNEWS