NOURNEWS- Over the past year or so, the Zionist regime has changed its position, openly targeting the ongoing attacks on various bases in Syria, and has not even hesitated to inflict casualties on them.
Most of these attacks are under the pretext of targeting Iranian advisory bases or hitting forces that, according to the regime's officials, operate under the command of the Islamic Republic!
Recently, contrary to the previous practice, after the aggressive attacks, the regime's defense minister, in a press conference, while acknowledging responsibility for the operation, stressed the need for the withdrawal of Iranian advisory forces, which are officially invited by the Syrian legitimate government.
Meanwhile, the US government has stepped up its support for the Zionist regime's attacks on Syrian territory, and has kind of endorsed it.
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo claimed after the latest Israeli airstrikes on Syria last week, while supporting the regime's provocative actions: "Iran supports Bashar al-Assad's crimes in Syria."
"The Islamic Republic must spend its resources on its internal affairs," he said in another part of his remarks, with the aim of taking advantage of existing sensitivities to learning about coronary heart disease and addressing Iranian public opinion.
Mike Pompeo's comments in support of the Zionist regime's repeated attacks on Syria and the need to withdraw from Iran come as Iran's pivotal role in countering terrorism in Syria and preventing its growth and development in other parts of the world has been proven. Is.
It is very clear that this coordinated action by the United States and the Zionist regime, based on the available evidence, should be sought in their intention to pursue other goals beyond Iran's so-called threat to the security of the Zionist regime.
In recent years, the Zionist regime has been more concerned about the "silencing" of proxy terrorist movements against the Syrian government and people, as well as the possibility of a wave of terrorism in the region, rather than the spread of ISIS and other takfiri groups.
The terrorist movement has always been able to occupy the countries of the region as a proxy force for the Zionist regime, and through this strategy (according to the officials of this regime), it has created security for Israel.
The rise of ISIS in Iraq and Syria and the spread of terrorism in the region, while bleeding the borders of the Islamic world, have historically eroded the financial, military and humanitarian capabilities of Islamic countries, especially Syria and Iraq.
The presence of the United States in the region and the imposition of heavy financial costs on Islamic countries, along with securing the borders of the Zionist regime, was the practical result of the development of Takfiri terrorism in the region.
The best evidence for this claim is that at no time in the history of the formation of the fake and usurping Zionist regime has there been such security as in recent years.
Although the actions of the Takfiri terrorist movement caused countless losses to the countries of the region, the effective confrontation of the Resistance Front with this affiliated current turned the threat of terrorism into strengthening the strength and capacities of the Resistance Front.
If the stabilization of the government supporting the resistance in Syria, the establishment of a parliament and a government in line with the resistance in Iraq, the restriction of the acting power of Al-Saud and the UAE due to the defeat in Syria, Iraq and Yemen and many other factors caused the fight against terrorism. Exceptional to further strengthen the political, military and security role of the resistance movement in the region.
Now that the main body of terrorism in Iraq and Syria has been broken and efficient military-popular structures have been established in the front lines of the resistance, the excuses for the US presence in the region have disappeared and the Islamic countries and the resistance have regained their power. That is to say, they have become a "Palestinian issue", increasing the common concerns of the United States and the Zionist regime and launching a large-scale effort to "rekindle the fire of terrorism" in the region and strike at the main centers of counter-insurgency.
Meanwhile, the Iraqi parliament's decision to withdraw foreign troops from Iraq, which was approved immediately after the martyrdom of Sardar Soleimani and Abu Mahdi al-Mohandes, has heightened US concerns and led to widespread movements in recent months.
The United States clearly knows that the pressure of the resistance groups in Iraq, due to the illegal presence of its military forces in Iraq, is not something that can be easily bypassed. Therefore, by trying to rebuild and reorganize the terrorist organization, it seeks to restart insecurity and destabilize and resume explosions in Iraq and Syria, and it wants to challenge the parliament's decision and, in turn, guarantee applications from inside Iraq to continue the US military presence.
What is certain is that the United States has never sought a real fight against ISIS in recent years, and has always "managed" the group in line with its goals, so given the recent events, it is clear that the United States is trying. It could pursue at least two goals by reviving part of the "Terrorism Front in the Region":
First, to keep the threat of terrorism in West and South-West Asia alive and to maintain its forces at the expense of Arab countries in the region under the pretext of controlling Iran, countering Russia's growing role in West Asia, and supporting the Zionist regime.
Second, by magnifying the threat posed by Iran in the field of nuclear, missile, and weapons activities, the strategy of "maximum pressure" should be continued with a spice of militarism and a tightening of the economic siege.
This approach will have at least three main audiences:
First, the Zionist regime, with which Trump continues to support its expansionist goals and secure its borders, seeks the support of the Zionist lobby in the 2020 elections.
Second, the Arab countries in the region that the United States will continue to support in exchange for more oil dollars.
And third, US public opinion on the eve of the upcoming presidential election, which should shift its focus from Trump's ongoing foreign policy failures to his new achievements in the region.
Accordingly, direct attacks by the Zionist regime on Syria (which, according to the regime's defense minister, will continue until Iran's complete withdrawal from Syria) are expected, along with the reconstruction of ISIS and Tahrir al-Sham forces in Iraq and Syria and increased political and economic pressure. And a system to continue in Iran.
In addition to the above, the United States will try to pursue the path of weakening the original anti-terrorism movement by increasing the cost of cooperation between the countries of the Resistance Front in the political arena.
NOURNEWS
NOURNEWS