“The principle of ‘commitment in exchange for commitment’ in the negotiations means that we will implement our commitments only as long as the other side implements its commitments,” Esmaril Baghaei said in a press briefing on Tuesday.
“No commitment is supposed to be implemented unilaterally.”
The spokesman's remarks came as the United States and Iran remain at odds over the implementation of the 14‑point MoU signed in mid‑June, which was supposed to end the US‑Israeli war of aggression against Iran and provide for the lifting of the naval blockade and the release of frozen Iranian assets.
Baghaei said Tehran had never expected the diplomatic process to proceed without challenges, given the deep mutual mistrust and bitter past experiences of US breaches of commitments and Israeli obstruction.
“From the very beginning, when we entered this diplomatic process, no one imagined a smooth and challenge‑free process. Keep in mind that this diplomatic process began after two wars, in less than a year, in an atmosphere of extreme suspicion, distrust, and given previous experiences of US faithlessness and obstruction by the Zionist regime.”
Lebanon ceasefire tests MoU
The spokesman said the MoU's first clause, which requires a cessation of military operations on all fronts, including Lebanon, is the most critical provision.
“The text of the memorandum is drafted very precisely and clearly. Both in clause one, which specifies that the cessation of war on all fronts must include Lebanon, and in the fact that the United States, as the other party to the memorandum, must adhere to its commitments and do whatever is necessary regarding Lebanon to ensure that the Zionist regime's military aggression against Lebanon is halted.”
Baghaei warned that if the US fails to rein in Israeli violations, Iran will not hesitate to use all available tools to protect its national security and interests.
No US meetings in Doha
Addressing reports of a possible meeting between Iranian and American officials in Doha, Baghaei categorically rejected that any such meeting had been planned.
"We had no plans for a meeting with American officials at any level in the coming days, so there was nothing to cancel," he said.
"What will likely take place in Doha tomorrow is a discussion on the implementation of certain clauses of the MoU, including the release of Iran's frozen assets, which will be conducted with Qatari officials. I emphasize that no meeting at any level with the American side has been scheduled for the coming days."
Baghaei said Iran has not yet entered the phase of final agreement negotiations and will not do so until the US begins implementing five key provisions of the MoU.
“We have not yet entered the negotiation phase for the final agreement. According to Article 13 of the Memorandum of Understanding, the start of negotiations for the final agreement is contingent upon the initiation of the implementation of Articles 1, 4, 5, 10, and 11, and the continuation of their implementation.”
He said while the US has issued the necessary licenses for Iranian oil exports under Article 10, the process for releasing Iran's blocked funds under Article 11 is still being pursued.
Martyred Leader’s funeral arrangements
Baghaei also detailed Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi's recent visit to Iraq, describing it as "very important" and the first such visit after the formation of Iraq's new government.
He said the visit focused on strengthening bilateral ties across political, economic, security and border cooperation, and on coordinating the funeral ceremonies for the martyred Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei in Iraq.
“The Iraqi people are eagerly awaiting to participate in the farewell ceremony for the martyred Leader of the Islamic Revolution, a figure known as a prominent scholar, a supreme religious authority, and a pioneer concerned with peace, security and dignity in the region.”
He said Iraq's leadership has formed a high‑level committee headed by his chief of staff to coordinate the ceremonies.
"The people of Iraq, like the people of Iran, are mourning the loss of the martyred Leader and his faithful companions," Baghaei said.
NATO chief's admission of complicity
Baghaei also addressed the recent admission by NATO's Secretary General that member states participated in the military aggression against Iran, calling it a clear confession of complicity in war crimes.
"This was not an unknown matter; it was clear to us that NATO and some of its member states were actively involved in the design, execution, and support of the aggressive actions of the United States and the Zionist regime against Iran," Baghaei said.
He stated that the admission has two dimensions, "First, it is a clear confession of complicity in the crime of aggression against Iran. Second, this confession is admissible in any court, both the NATO Secretary General as someone who had a role in this decision‑making, and all NATO member states that participated in this decision and in its implementation, will bear international responsibility for committing an internationally wrongful act."
Baghaei added that the crimes committed in Minab, Lamerd and elsewhere in Iran can now be attributed as war crimes to NATO member states, their commanders, and decision‑makers.
"Some European countries are trying to justify and absolve themselves of participation in these crimes by claiming their support was limited to 'technical and logistical support.' This in no way lessens the burden of the crime they committed. Under international law, any participation in the commission of the crime of aggression against other countries is prohibited and condemned," he said.
"Therefore, it is natural that the Islamic Republic of Iran will continue its formal demand for accountability from all parties that directly or indirectly played a role in the aggressive operations of the United States and the Zionist regime against Iran."
The Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding was signed on June 18, 2026, bringing an end to the US‑Israeli war of aggression against Iran that began on February 28.
The 14‑point agreement committed both sides to an immediate and permanent cessation of military operations on all fronts, including Lebanon.
However, Israel has continued strikes in southern Lebanon in violation of the ceasefire, and the US has threatened Iran with renewed military action.
Iran has insisted that any final agreement is contingent on the full implementation of the MoU, particularly the cessation of hostilities in Lebanon.
Press TV