Nournews: Following Trump’s remarks about the existence of a prior deal with Iran, information received by Nournews indicates that this claim lacks any real foundation. During the course of indirect negotiations between Tehran and Washington, no agreement on any issue has been reached.
Trump claimed: “Assuming Iran agrees to deliver what was previously agreed upon — which may be a big assumption — the epic anger that has now become legendary will come to an end, and a highly effective blockade will result in the Strait of Hormuz being opened to everyone, including Iran.”
However, according to available information, Iran has clearly presented its demands throughout the negotiation process, and the U.S. side is fully aware of Tehran’s red lines. These talks have been conducted through a Pakistani intermediary, with several rounds of proposal exchanges between the two sides, none of which have led to an agreement so far.
At present, the proposal put forward by the United States is under review in Tehran, and no final conclusion has yet been announced.
Meanwhile, some Western media outlets, by publishing accounts about the details of a potential agreement or the parties’ demands, have attempted to shape the atmosphere of the negotiations—claims which, according to informed sources, are largely unfounded and will not affect Iran’s principled positions.
The timing of these narratives, alongside proposals such as the so-called “Freedom Project” and threats of “large-scale bombardment” by Trump, also suggests that the United States is using psychological and media tools to exert pressure on the negotiation process—an approach that will only further complicate the current situation.
Nournews