Nournews: What stands out in the declared positions of the Islamic Republic of Iran, particularly in statements issued by the Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters, is the emphasis on sovereign rights in territorial and surrounding waters. Under widely recognized international rules, this right allows every country to ensure the security of its vital routes. From this perspective, monitoring and controlling the Strait of Hormuz is described not as an exceptional act, but as part of any state’s natural responsibility for its national security.
Relying on this principle, Iran has signaled that it will not remain passive in the face of threats against its vital interests. This stance becomes particularly significant at times when external pressures intensify.
Naval Blockade: An Illegal and Destabilizing Policy
U.S. policies in the region—especially efforts to impose restrictions on maritime passage—are viewed in Tehran as a clear violation of international law. Such measures are seen as not only undermining freedom of navigation, but also directly threatening global trade security.
Contrary to Washington’s claim of providing security, its military presence and continued interventions are described as having led to rising tensions and insecurity. Experience in recent years, according to this perspective, suggests that wherever foreign intervention has increased, instability has also grown. In contrast, Iran portrays its efforts as relying on domestic capabilities to support the emergence of a fair regional security order.
Collective Security: A Strategy Against Unilateralism
The principle of “security for all or for no one” is framed as a response to unilateralism. This approach sends a clear message to regional and extra-regional actors: security cannot be ensured selectively.
By promoting this concept, Iran is effectively calling for equal security for all countries in the region, arguing that no power should be able to endanger others’ security through coercive pressure. This view stands in direct contrast to policies that seek to create strategic advantages by imposing restrictions on certain states.
Implications: From Redefining Balance to Sustainable Stability
Iran’s firm stance could lead to a redefinition of the balance of power in the Persian Gulf. The message that insecurity for one country would mean insecurity for all is presented as a deterrent against escalatory actions.
At the same time, this approach could pave the way for new dialogues on regional security—dialogues based on mutual respect and non-interference by external powers. If strengthened, such a path could foster the emergence of lasting stability.
In conclusion, what the Islamic Republic of Iran seeks, according to this narrative, is not the restriction of global trade, but the prevention of economic and maritime tools being turned into instruments of political pressure—an objective that, if achieved, would benefit the entire region and even the global economy.
Nournews