Nournews: The Strait of Hormuz has become a key factor in the conflict, giving Iran a strategic advantage over the US and Israel. Several US allies—including France, the UK, Germany, Australia, Italy, Finland, Japan, and even NATO—have rejected Trump’s request to join what he calls efforts to reopen the strait. This has increased tensions for Trump, as their refusal reflects distrust in US leadership and concerns about the consequences of escalation.
Iran’s Unity and Strength
Western countries and NATO have a history of military interventions and sanctions. However, Iran’s national unity, military strength, and economic resilience have forced them to reconsider the costs of confrontation. Germany has stated that if the US cannot act in the Strait of Hormuz, other countries will not be able to do so either.
Legal Realities on the Ground
Iran has the legal right to manage the Strait of Hormuz, especially in wartime, as other countries have done in similar situations. For decades, Iran has followed a policy of cooperation, but under current conditions, it may use this right to respond to aggression.
Under NATO’s Article 5, the alliance can only act if a member is attacked—not when a member initiates aggression. The US-Israeli actions lack UN Security Council approval, making participation in them a violation of international law. Many US allies see involvement as a dangerous precedent.
US Failure to Build Consensus
The US, especially under Trump, has failed to gain international support. This is evident in global forums and recent conflicts. At the same time, global criticism of Israel has made countries more cautious about joining a war linked to it.
Trump’s “Israel First” approach has reduced trust among allies. Some countries now see their security as secondary to Israel’s interests. Even US policies on energy and relations with Russia have raised concerns among European allies.
The Path Forward
US allies cannot present their refusal to join as a concession to Iran or demand something in return. Silence or inaction in the face of aggression is unacceptable.
Any dialogue with Iran requires clear condemnation of the aggression, practical steps to stop it, guarantees against its repetition, and recognition of Iran’s legal rights in the Strait of Hormuz.
Global dynamics have changed. Iran now plays a decisive role, and symbolic diplomacy without real action will no longer be effective.
NOURNEWS