News ID : 191777
Publish Date : 9/30/2024 10:21:29 PM
Dream of revenge for 2006 defeat will not come true

Dream of revenge for 2006 defeat will not come true

NOURNEWS – America, in its illusion of giving birth to a new Middle East, which is based on the destruction of resistance, has put the genocide in Gaza and the assassination of Hezbollah leaders on its agenda, but the truth is that this illusion will also be blown away like in 2006, and in the end, it is the resistance movement that will determine the fate of the region.

The Zionist regime's state terrorism in the assassination of Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, the Secretary-General of Hezbollah, was met with widespread global outrage and condemnation, while the US leaders, without mentioning principles such as the violation of Lebanon's sovereignty and the role and position of Hezbollah and Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah in Lebanon's governmental structure, and any action against them being considered an aggression against the sovereignty and independence of a UN member state and state terrorism, supported this great crime.

The Americans claimed that they had no information about the Zionist's crazy and savage attack on Lebanon and the massacre of thousands of people, but their enthusiasm for this assassination reveals Washington's undeniable role in the assassination and genocide in Lebanon, and they cannot escape responsibility for it under any pretext.

Joe Biden, the President of the United States, described the assassination of Hassan Nasrallah as "an act to establish justice for his many victims." Biden said that Nasrallah's "victims" included "thousands of Americans, Israelis, and Lebanese civilians." Biden emphasized that the US fully supports Israel's right to defend itself against Hezbollah, Hamas, the Houthis in Yemen, and "any terrorist group backed by Iran." The US President also said that he had ordered the Pentagon to strengthen the defensive position of US military forces in the Middle East to "prevent aggression." Biden claimed that the US goal is to reduce tensions in West Asia, Lebanon, and Gaza through diplomacy.

Meanwhile, Harris, the US Vice President and Democratic Party candidate, in reaction to the Zionist regime's terrorist operation that martyred the Secretary-General of Hezbollah in Lebanon, described the operation as "the implementation of justice". She stated: "I have an unwavering commitment to maintaining Israel's security." She claimed: "Hassan Nasrallah was a terrorist whose hands were stained with American blood. In recent decades, Hezbollah's leadership under him has contributed to instability in the Middle East and the killing of civilians in Syria, Lebanon, Israel, and around the world. Today, Hezbollah's victims have seen justice." Harris added in her hostile statement: "I will always support Israel's right to defend itself against Iran and Iranian-backed terrorist groups such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis." Harris claimed: "Diplomacy is the best way to protect civilians and achieve sustainable peace in the region.”

These remarks by Harris and Biden, while showing that there is no difference between Harris and Trump, and Democrats and Republicans, they are all of the same fabric, and those who think that Harris and the Democrats are proponents of negotiation and diplomacy, and that their arrival is a security-maker, and Trump's arrival is a security-breaker, are living in a fanciful illusion that has no connection to reality. These remarks contain three noteworthy keywords: justice, security, and ceasefire.

A look at the United States' record over the past few decades, at least since World War II, shows the repetition of these words by American leaders. The Americans, while bombing Japan with nuclear bombs, introduced this crime as an act of justice and improving world security, and after the massacre in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, they spoke of ceasefire and peace in order to conceal their crimes.

In Vietnam, they also justified years of massacres with toxic gases, rape and assault on Vietnamese and Thai women, and widespread genocide with the words "justice" and "security". Each time, they used the words "peace" and "ceasefire" to absolve themselves of global punishment. They repeated this approach in the First and Second Gulf Wars, and in the 1990s, they repeated the same phrase in the context of the massacres and genocide in Srebrenica and the Balkans, and then spoke of peace and ceasefire.

In Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Sudan, and other places, they justified their killings and destruction with the same words "justice" and "security", and never held themselves accountable for their crimes. A year has passed since the al-Aqsa storm and the genocide in Gaza, and the Americans have daily called the killing of Palestinians an act of "security" and "justice", and have used this pretext to give billions of dollars in arms to the Zionist regime, and have labeled any attempt to pass a resolution in the Security Council or to hold the regime accountable as "injustice".

Notably, after each major massacre and crime against Gaza, which has claimed the lives of tens of thousands of women and children, they have used the keyword "ceasefire" to absolve the Zionist regime and themselves of punishment. Now, once again in Lebanon, the Americans, without considering the genocide and state terrorism of the Zionists, have repeated the same tired phrases, and ultimately claimed to support diplomacy and a ceasefire to prevent the spread of war.

The cumulative behavior of Americans over the past year shows that the American definition of security and justice means securing their interests and the Zionist regime, which has resulted and will result in the massacre of thousands of people. The important point is that the words of American leaders are reminiscent of the developments of 2006, when individuals such as Rice, the then US Secretary of State, announced the birth of a new Middle East and called the blood of the Lebanese people the result of this birth. At that time, the United States and some Europeans were fully on the side of the Zionists, while in the end, it was Hezbollah and the resistance that determined the fate of the region and the new Middle East was born, but not in the American style, but based on the criteria and patterns of resistance, which has continued to this day and has taken on broader dimensions during the Al-Aqsa storm over the past year.

Today, the Americans are also in the illusion of the same new Middle East birth, the basis of which is the destruction of resistance, countering the approach of Arab countries to a new multi-polar order, increasing regional convergence with Russia and China, implementing the scenario from the Nile to the Euphrates, and forcing Iran into nuclear, missile, and regional JCPOA, hand in hand with the Zionists, they have implemented a year of genocide in Gaza and also the assassination of Hezbollah commanders, including Martyr Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, the Secretary-General of Hezbollah, but the truth is that this illusion, like in 2006, will also be blown away and ultimately it is the resistance and the school of  that determines the fate of the region. The martyrdom of Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah will impose increasing insecurity on the region and its main creators, the Zionist regime and the United States. Future developments will show that creating instability and insecurity to shape the new order desired by the Zionists and the United States, which is to dominate the region and turn it into a platform for global unilateralism, has been a costly illusion and a gross miscalculation that will never be achieved.


NOURNEWS
Comments

first name & last name

email

comment