NOURNEWS- The cameras only showed supporters of Seyyed Hassan Nasrallah in front of the monitors that broadcasted his speech; But the reality was that a larger population in the United States, the cabinet of the Israeli regime, the military forces, the residents of the occupied territories and millions of people around the world were sitting and watching their televisions or any other form of outlet to see and evaluate the effect of every word uttered by the Secretary General of Lebanon's Hezbollah on the fate of the residents and the leaders of the occupied territories. It was on this basis that the Israeli and Hebrew-language newspaper “Haaretz” admitted: “The mere fact that all of Israel sat in front of the television on Friday to listen to Nasrallah's speech is in itself a victory and an important dimension in the psychological war.”
Psychological warfare of Seyyed Hassan Nasrallah
Seyyed Hassan Nasrallah's speech on Friday began in a situation where the publication of three ambiguous and warning videos of him in the days leading up to November 3, had drawn all eyes to the south of Lebanon and the border of the occupied territories; A place where, since the first day after the “Al-Aqsa Storm” operation, is still in unstable conditions, and the limited exchange of fire between the forces of Hezbollah and the occupying regime showed that the escalation of conflicts was likely. In the afternoon of November 3, everyone was waiting to see what the strategy of the charismatic leader of Lebanon's Hezbollah is for the coming days and where he will lead the region?
The failed “fight or retreat” scenario
Western-Hebrew media analysts, since the day when the speech of the Secretary General of Lebanon's Hezbollah was announced, tried to create the expectation in the public opinion of the world that Seyyed Hassan Nasrallah wants to give the order of fire by declaring a comprehensive and full-scale war in West Asia. This puzzle also had other components that were previously dictated by the United States to its huge propaganda and media apparatus in all parts of the world. “Finding similarities between Al Aqsa Storm operation and September 11” and “Calling resistance forces in the region as something worse than ISIS” with baseless claims such as beheading babies or persecuting prisoners detained by Hamas are two big pieces of the fake image of America and its regional ally for the justification for the brutality and violence of the Israeli regime. While the Zionist regime, by besieging two million and 300,000 civilians in Gaza, has crossed all humanitarian values and human rights lines, it has used all its propaganda tools from the beginning to legitimize its actions and make the other side, including Seyyed Hassan Nasrallah, introduce as the people who want to spread the fire of conflicts in Gaza and the occupied territories to the entire region. Inducing this image to public opinion will provide suitable conditions for the Zionist regime's desire to enter extra-regional countries into a military conflict in West Asia.
A deterring warning!
In simpler words, Washington and Tel Aviv intended to shift the focus from the issue of “Palestine” to a military conflict by setting a two-option scenario of “war or retreat” against Seyyed Hassan Nasrallah and other influential figures and countries in the region, or by intensifying and expanding tensions, or by creating an atmosphere before the speech of the Secretary General of Lebanon's Hezbollah, the declaration of any policy other than a full-scale war on his part should induce “hesitancy and fear”. But Seyyed Hassan Nasrallah's unpredictable stance on the developments in Gaza was out of the framework that America and the Zionist regime had designed and prepared; Because instead of talking about the need to expand the war, the Secretary General of Lebanon's Hezbollah offered a solution to end the war, and to put it more precisely, he made his statements in the context of a deterring warning!
Intelligent combat instead of all-out war
Seyyed Hassan Nasrallah, recalling the war that started on October 8, the day after the “Al-Aqsa Storm” operation, on the border of Lebanon and the occupied territories, announced a controlled battle that, while weakening the resources of the Israeli regime, diverted the concentration of at least one-third of the Zionist forces from Gaza to the northern border. Without giving specific details, he sent clear and powerful signals that any option is on the table, but changing any process depends on changing the behavior of the other party, and in this regard, the other party is responsible for the expansion and spread of the war with the Israeli and American regimes. In his speech, the Secretary General of Lebanon's Hezbollah did not deny the possibility of large-scale conflicts, but instead of an all-out military conflict, he announced a smart battle that is no longer limited to border operations. He also specified the extent of the new phase of the war and with this stance, he did not take a step towards the war that is desired by the Zionists.
Open hand and ambiguous strategy
While emphasizing that Tel Aviv is pursuing goals that are definitely not attainable, the Secretary General of Lebanon's Hezbollah left the presence and role of the organization under his responsibility unclear. The sum of the positions showed that, contrary to the demands of America and the Zionist regime, Seyyed Hassan Nasrallah's words were measured and responsible rather than fiery and emotional. The first result of this speech was achieved before its beginning; In the days leading up to November 3, when not only the cameras of all political and media circles zoomed in on one of the key figures of the axis of resistance, but the visit of the US Secretary of State to the occupied territories for the third time at the same time as the speech of the Secretary General of Lebanon's Hezbollah, showed the failure of a policy that has been going on for years which it is followed by Washington and Tel Aviv, and it intends to remove groups like Hezbollah from the political and security relations of the region; But both this group and its other official and unofficial allies are among the main players in the equations of West Asia, and they have the first and last word in this region. In the latest development, the Secretary General of Lebanon's Hezbollah, while not giving an excuse to the other side, left his hand open to use all options; Options can be implemented whenever needed, without needing to be notified or advertised!
BY: Pooya Mirzaei
NOURNEWS