NOURNEWS- In addition to the field and security effects, the occurrence of the proud operation code-named the “Al Aqsa Storm” has led to great relations and has generated discourse effects in the region, the most important of which is the destruction of the “compromising discourse” with the Zionists and its accessories, including the “Abraham accord” and the “Two-State solution”.
During the years and decades after the establishment of the fake regime and the occupation of Jerusalem, the compromise discourse has had various examples, from the Oslo Peace Treaty to the Annapolis Conference and the agreement to normalize Arab-Israeli relations. These one-sided agreements are designed and regulated under the doctrine and macro view of the American governments towards West Asia and basically have no effect nor any relation to achieving real and everlasting peace in the region.
The core attempts of compromise have been carried out in the shadow of some frameworks, a review of which can make the analysis of the current and future conditions of this discourse much easier and clearer.
The official failure of the US in Afghanistan and Iraq was the revealing point of the failure of the “Greater Middle East” plan. In troubled Iraq and Afghanistan, neither “liberal democracy” nor “powerful America” emerged.
Even the presence of “Barack Obama” in the White House could not free America from this vortex until it reached the point where the Obama administration itself accepted “multilateralism” as a “bitter truth” in the field of this country’s foreign policy, but at the same time, in a dangerous game, Obama tried to change the regional order of West Asia and subsequently, change the world order by creating Takfiri terrorism and specifically the terror group of ISIS.
“Joe Biden”, Obama's vice president at the time, also relied on the plan of “dividing Iraq” based on ethnicity and religion, and tried to give a new meaning to the mixed and dangerous formula of “unilateralism in the heart of multilateralism”! By 2015, the Takfiri terrorism which was supported behind the scenes by America was supposed to destroy the governments of Iraq and Syria and then deliver a scorched earth called “Shamat” to the White House and the Zionist regime, but the all-round stability of the resistance disrupted the calculations of the West and the Zionists in Baghdad, Damascus and In general, the West Asian region.
With the presence of Trump at the top of the executive equations of the United States, he spoke of “returning to a powerful America” and with the aim of restoring the lost and irreversible hegemony of the United States, he took any sort of action, including unilateralism in NATO and disrupting the rules of the World Trade Organization. He pulled out of all multilateral agreements to make America “powerful” and “unique,” as he put it.
On the other hand; Trump brought Washington's support to ISIS and other Takfiri terrorist groups to its peak in order to make up for the failure and desperation of the Obama administration's strategists against the resistance front.
But in 2018; Despite the comprehensive support of the United States, the self-proclaimed caliphate of ISIS completely collapsed, and the resistance fighters reproduced the power equations in the region exactly against the “discourse of compromise”.
In the 2020 election, Trump lost to Biden in a controversial competition, when he left the White House, there was no news of “American hegemony” or “revival of American unilateralism in the heart of multilateralism” and, as a result, the new world order envisioned by America already became a mere “abstract concept”.
Joe Biden came to power while he had in his mind the premise of the division of the West Asian region based on ethnic and religious components. Accordingly, the Zionists fully supported Biden and his government.
The redefinition of ISIS has become a joint project of Washington and Tel Aviv in recent months, and contrary to media insinuations, many of the actions of the Netanyahu government in the Judaization of Jerusalem were done with the favorable opinion and even the behind-the-scenes management of the White House.
In a situation where America has lost even the ability to study the future and predict future developments in the region and its absolute support for the occupation regime of Al-Quds has become Washington's security, regional, and international Achilles heel, talking about compromise with the Zionists, which gave birth to the interventionist doctrines of the West in the region, is considered superficial and pointless, and, in the end, due to current development, the inevitable death of the compromise discourse has been officially announced.
BY: Pooya Mirzaei
NOURNEWS