Prince Harry is a symbol of the British ruling system
There is no doubt that Harry's behavior can be defined in a racist and egocentric framework, according to which human life has no value. A behavior that, of course, has become a hereditary thing in the royal family.
NOURNEWS - Prince Harry, the son of Charles, the current King of England, who is hated by a significant number of people in this country, told in his memoirs about the days he served as an Apache helicopter pilot in Afghanistan.
He talks about the killing of 25 Afghans and further states that I felt that those I killed were chess pieces and not human beings! The English prince added; "I don't feel ashamed of what I did, but I'm not proud of it either."
The plan of these words by the English prince was accompanied by many international reactions, so that many have considered it as weakening the position of the royal family and increasing the approach of the British people to republicanism and removing the monarchy.
This situation has caused the media related to the royal family, who consider it their duty to protect the throne, to come to the field to justify and support Harry's inhumane behavior, as during the death of Elizabeth II, they were busy highlighting and showing a face for two weeks. They were enduring from the queen and setting the stage for Charles's reign with a series of corruptions and scandals.
In this framework; These media, including the BBC, started producing content and interviewing old soldiers and experts in the security field. For example, "Richard Kemp", the former colonel of the British army, told the BBC; Harry's comments about these deaths were "poor judgment". These statements may endanger his safety and encourage others to take revenge."
In Harry's defense, he mentions that the Ministry of Defense spokesperson, in response to a question about the number of people killed by Prince Harry, said; We do not comment on operational details for security reasons.
"Ben McBain", a former British marine who flew with Harry many times also claimed; He is proud of his contribution [in the Afghanistan war], but that does not justify him talking about the number of people he killed.
The point is; The royal media, including the Farsi-speaking ones, among the interviews and news processing with a calculated approach, choose the opinions of users in such a way that the negative views about the Taliban's performance are highlighted and the audience sees Harry's behavior as a human and humane action and any negative reaction to it, is a behavior to show support for repressive behaviors.
In this regard; In addition to the news related to Harry's words, these media have highlighted and republished reports about the restrictions imposed by the Taliban on women!
At the same time, these media continue to avoid mentioning the financial connection between Charles and the family of Al-Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden.
Charles is also accused of accepting hundreds of thousands of pounds in bribes from Mahfouz bin Marai, a Saudi businessman and a relative of bin Salman, who is accused of murdering Khashoggi, to receive a medal in England.
There is no doubt that Harry's behavior can be defined in a racist and self-righteous framework, according to which human lives have no value, a behavior that, of course, has become a hereditary thing in the royal family, as the recent confessions and statements of the daughter-in-law of the royal family about the queen's racist attitudes And his family is a witness to this claim.
Also, cases such as the ambiguity in the death of "Princess Diana", the former wife of Charles, the Queen of England not apologizing to the natives of Canada whose children were buried alive in mass graves during the decades of the Queen's rule over Canada, and the granting of the royal seal to " Tony Blair, the former Prime Minister of England, whose crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan are still open, are manifestations of these behaviors.
Although the files of accusations against British soldiers in Afghanistan and Iraq have been closed by the Ministry of Defense of this country, the role of the royal family in the killing of millions of people in British war-mongering, including in Iraq and Afghanistan, is undeniable, and even today, British leaders with human rights claims continue to interfere in They are busy with the affairs of other countries and creating an atmosphere of chaos.
BY: Mohammad Ghaderi
NOUNEWS