America and Europe are the big losers of Syria's return to the Arab League
Based on many indicators, as Western strategists also admit, the influence and presence of the US in West Asia is decreasing; Saudi Arabia is making peace with Iran and America's closest Arab partners are welcoming Syria to the Arab world.
NOURNEWS: These days, the Western media conveys Syria's return to the Arab League to the public opinion of the world only in the form of mere normal news, without mentioning the strategic value and regional and extra-regional support of this important event!
At the time of the establishment of ISIS at the hands of American intelligence agencies and the Zionist regime, senior Western officials did not imagine that after a decade, they would be forced to accept a reality called the survival of the Syrian government and the powerful return of this country to the Arab League.
The ominous plan of overthrowing the Syrian regime and severing the connections between the components of the resistance front had been cooked up many times in the minds of the West and the Zionist regime, and in these calculations, there is absolutely no news of the possibility of Syria returning to the Arab League.
The strategy of turning Syria and Iraq into scorched earth and fallen countries has now turned into a strategy of accepting a new regional order in West Asia centered on the resistance front's agendas, and this should be considered a crude calculative and strategic failure of the West.
Certainly, in this equation, the Western players, including France, England, and Germany, as the facilitators of the US strategy in advancing the plan to overthrow the Syrian regime, have also been severely exposed to the effects and consequences of this great failure.
The nature and perspective of the current events in West Asia are certainly not in the interest of the United States and the European Union and are in complete conflict with their roadmap and strategy at the beginning of the establishment of ISIS.
After Bush Jr. came to office and the occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq by the United States and its allies, the illusory hypothesis of "the need to determine the structure of the new world order by the United States" received more attention and reference from Western politicians.
The theories of the war of civilizations by "Samuel P. Huntington" and The End of History and the Last Man by "Francis Fukuyama" also became the theoretical lines of this alleged system.
Today, however; Based on many indicators, as Western strategists also admit, the influence and presence of America in the Middle East is decreasing; Saudi Arabia is making peace with Iran, and America's closest Arab partners are welcoming Syria to the Arab world.
As can be seen, the US has failed even in drawing its "supporter-follower" network and creating new strategic links with its regional and traditional allies.
In these circumstances, even the comparative comparison of America's alleged "new Middle East" at the beginning of the 21st century and today's regional relations in West Asia, which is derived from the collective rationality and the special strength of the actors of the resistance front in rejecting American-European interventionism in the region, is something that the politicians and even the most experienced Western strategists could not agree upon and they could not create the current unity in the Middle East, and this is a fact that everyone acknowledges.
Now, the European players, who had prepared themselves to shape their new domination models in the West Asian region, on the one hand, must bear the costs of the victory of the resistance front in the region, including the acceptance of Syria as a powerful member of the Arab League, and on the other hand, they must learn and face the methods of interaction with new conditions!
To be more precise; Now the West is paying the price for its lack of strategic and calculating rationality regarding the current realities in the West Asian region.
BY: Mohammad Ghaderi
NOUNEWS