NOURNEWS - France has a long history of pursuing anti-Islamic policies. In the last two weeks, following the suspicious murder of a teacher in France, who is allegedly killed for showing an insulting caricature of the Prophet Mohammad (PBUH), French officials, led by the French president, have called Islam an extremist religion.
Emmanuel Macron's action in supporting the publication of cartoons insulting Islamic sanctities under the pretext of supporting the values of secularism was accompanied by the anger and condemnation of the Muslims of the world.
The remarkable thing about the allegations made about the murder of this teacher is that; From the very beginning, the finger of blame was immediately pointed at Muslims, and the French authorities and media, without investigation, blamed Muslims for the murder.
Now the question is how the nature of the killer is determined so quickly and in the shortest possible time, and instead of the person being accused, his religion and above 1.5 billion Muslims are called killers?
The move comes as France's governing body has taken a more pro-Islamic stance in recent weeks, with the French president backing Charlie Hebdo when he republished the insulting cartoons.
In early October, meanwhile, Emmanuel Macron unveiled a French government bill to combat "religious separatism" and prevent the spread of extremist views, and announced his intention to abolish the education system for imams and religious preachers abroad. Let the country free Islam in its country from foreign influence!
The bill, which is expected to be submitted to the Council of Ministers by the end of this year and submitted to the French parliament early next year, will impose restrictions on the education and activities of Islamic circles and organizations.
According to Macron's plan, oversight of the training and education of imams and Islamic preachers is also to be strengthened, as well as control over how funds and religious institutions are funded.
Given these behaviors, the question arises as to why anti-Islamism has become a fundamental principle in the behavior of French government officials. In answer to this question, a few points are remarkable:
First,; Anti-Islamism has been one of the traditional policies of the French government in recent times, which can be seen in the behavior of "Nicolas Sarkozy", "François Hollande" and now Macron, in the form of passing laws or speeches and official positions.
It is noteworthy that; Such positions are taken by the French authorities while claiming French identity and, of course, the implementation of democracy and freedom, a look at their behavior shows that this alleged identity is only in the form of opposition to Islam.
The rule of anti-Islamic spirit over the laws and the executive structure, supporting the insult to the sanctities of Muslims such as Charlie Hebdo, the adoption and implementation of anti-hijab laws, etc. are among the things that are unparalleled in any other religion, if any comment about The Holocaust is considered anti-Semitic and a crime, but insulting Islam is called freedom!
Second; Macron is seeking to retain power and repeat his presidency as opinion polls suggest he is in critical condition. According to a poll published in Le Journal du Dimanche, Macron's popularity among French people has risen to 38.7 percent, while new French Prime Minister Jean-Castique is about 10 percent. It is more popular.
Macron's sharp decline in popularity is compounded by his inability to manage France's corona crisis, which has topped the list of countries on the corona list, leading to continued economic and living conditions, popular protests and the growing power of Macron's rivals.
In such circumstances, it is clear that Macron is trying to turn the French public opinion against the inability of the government to support the people against the Corona, to turn the confrontation with Islam and Muslims into a security issue, and thus prevent street protests by the yellow vest.
At the same time, Macron is trying to attract far-right supporters who have an anti-Islamic, anti-refugee and anti-foreigner outlook with populist deception and behavior, while introducing himself as the axis of anti-Islamism, in order to enjoy their votes in the upcoming elections.
Third; France seeks to dominate Europe, especially after Britain's withdrawal from the European Union, while intensifying its military operations in Africa and West Asia, and expanding its influence in the Mediterranean with a focus on energy interests, leveling its confrontation with Turkey. Upgraded.
More precisely; It can be seen that the French leaders, with their anti-Islamic approach, are trying to justify militarism in North Africa and West Asia and even their confrontation with Turkey, in addition to introducing themselves as representatives of the far right in the European Union.
Fourth, Macron has shown that he has failed to deliver on his promise to restore French independence, and that Paris remains obedient to the United States on the one hand and under Zionist control on the other.
The US-designed compromise process between some Arab countries, such as the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain, with the Zionist regime has provoked a wave of anger and disgust against these regimes and the United States, while intensifying support for Palestine and confrontation with the Zionist regime. Now France, which has always played a complementary role in US policy, has repeated the same approach to the reconciliation process.
With an anti-Islamic approach, the French leaders intend to make the issue of insulting Islamic sanctities and confronting French anti-Islamism a priority for the Islamic world in order to divert public opinion from the betrayals of some Arab leaders to Palestine and prevent a popular uprising against these rulers. Make confronting the Zionist regime a priority for Islamic countries.
This is all the more evident when, at the same time as the announcement of Sudan's compromise with the Zionist regime, a new round of Macron anti-Islamism has begun to remove the issue of Palestine and the struggle against the Zionist regime from the center of the Islamic world.
France, once ruled by an independent approach in Europe and even the world under "Charles de Gaulle" and "Jacques Chirac", has now reached a point where it has no choice but to follow the orders of Tel Aviv and Washington through its crude, inefficient and dependent rulers.
BY: Mohammad Ghaderi
NOURNEWS