Nournews: Donald Trump, with an expansionist approach and a focus on strategic and oil-rich regions, launched multiple wars during his year in office in an effort to consolidate U.S. hegemony. However, the Ramadan War and the display of power by Iran and the Resistance Front undermined this project and turned it into a nightmare for his ambitions.

The failure to achieve military objectives pushed Trump toward using alternative tools to manage the crisis. Meanwhile, the United States faced an unprecedented internal crisis—one that manifested itself through the assassination and disappearance of prominent scientists.

In response to reporters’ questions about the disappearance or killing of scientists with access to classified information in nuclear and aerospace sectors, Trump emphasized that the matter was extremely serious and that some of those individuals were among the most important figures—remarks that highlight the depth of the crisis.

A Shared Assassination Pattern and the Direct Role of Mossad

The assassination of American scientists has reportedly been carried out according to the same operational pattern previously used by Mossad in various countries—a pattern based on targeted, intelligence-driven operations and the precise elimination of scientific elites.

This model had earlier been employed in the assassination of nuclear scientists in Iran, Iraq, and Egypt, and is now said to have been repeated in the United States using the same methods. The killing of 11 American scientists is presented as a clear example of the transfer of this pattern into the heart of the United States’ scientific and security structure.

The policy of nuclear secrecy attributed to the Israeli regime has long been accompanied by the assassination of elites in other countries in order to preserve its security and military superiority. According to this narrative, the same strategy is now being pursued with the aim of controlling America’s technological capacities.

The silence and lack of transparency from U.S. intelligence agencies, including the CIA, have not reduced ambiguities but, according to this view, have instead reinforced suspicions about Mossad’s involvement in these assassinations.

Structural Infiltration and Covert Internal Management

The infiltration of Mossad into U.S. intelligence and decision-making structures is described as providing the foundation for these assassinations. The leakage of confidential information from institutions linked to nuclear and technological sectors allegedly enabled the identification and elimination of scientists.

Repeated warnings about information leaks from international institutions and suspicious communications within these structures are cited as evidence of deep infiltration that could make such operations possible.

Within this framework, infiltration into agencies such as the CIA is portrayed as preventing transparent investigations into the assassination of 11 scientists. Just as in the events of September 11, where, according to critics, the full truth remained hidden despite numerous pieces of evidence, a similar pattern is claimed to be unfolding in this case.

The objective of such infiltration is described as creating technological dependency and gaining control over critical American infrastructure so that the country’s strategic decisions can be influenced from within.

Shifts in Public Opinion and Reactions to Alleged Influence

In response to these developments, U.S. public opinion is said to be undergoing notable changes. A significant portion of society has reportedly concluded that dependence on the Israeli regime has imposed heavy costs on their country.

The expansion of anti-Zionist protests at universities and research centers is cited as a sign of this shift in perception. Additionally, reported opposition by 70 percent of Americans to a war against Iran is presented as evidence of public distancing from imposed policies.

In the political arena, this divide is also described as becoming visible—for example, through the resignation of a U.S. counterterrorism official who reportedly stated that Iran was not a threat to the United States and that entering war served Israel’s interests. Increasing calls in Congress to halt military aid are also cited as evidence of declining influence.

Under such conditions, the Israeli regime is portrayed as relying on tools such as the assassination of scientists and deeper infiltration in an attempt to maintain control—so much so that daily reporting by the U.S. Vice President to Tel Aviv is described as a sign of the level of influence.

Strategic Implications

Based on this perspective, the assassination of 11 American scientists following an alleged Mossad pattern is framed as part of a broader strategy to control human and technological resources and ultimately dominate the U.S. decision-making structure. Such actions are described as simultaneously creating internal crises while strengthening strategic dependency.

Within this context, Mossad’s alleged transfer of assassination methods into the United States is portrayed as elevating covert warfare to a new level—using the elimination of elites as a tool to deepen dependency, consolidate influence, and maintain dominance.