Nournews: For years, the U.S. has tried to justify its pressure on the Islamic Republic of Iran under the slogan of “normal relations between Iran and the world.” Donald Trump continued this policy in a more explicit tone, claiming that Iran must return to the global order. But the reality is that what the U.S. means by “normal relations” is not equal interaction, but rather submission to Western hegemony. While Iran has established constructive relations with many countries, particularly its neighbors and emerging Asian powers, and has joined alliances such as the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, BRICS, and the Eurasian Union, the claim of Iran’s isolation is more of an American delusion than fact.
The American global order: A cover for domination
A close look at the behavior of the United States reveals that its concept of global order is rooted in the colonial-era dominance model—a system imposed through force, sanctions, and threats. From the destruction of Native American communities to the support of the Zionist regime and invasions of independent nations, America’s vision of order leaves no room for national sovereignty. Numerous countries, including Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Sudan, have fallen victim to this self-proclaimed order, which primarily serves the interests of the U.S. and Israel.
Iran: A pillar of resistance and multilateralism
Contrary to American desires, Iran has managed to challenge the U.S. unilateral order and play a significant role in shaping a multilateral global structure. Not only has Iran maintained strong and brotherly ties with neighboring countries, but it has also played an active and influential role in regional and international organizations. Its political, economic, defense, and scientific achievements have introduced a new model of independence and resistance against domination—an example that other nations can follow. The recent hostile reactions from the U.S. and the Zionist regime clearly indicate that this model is seen as a serious threat to them.
The clear contradictions in U.S. behavior
While the U.S. speaks of Iran’s return to the global order and negotiation, it has been the main party to violate agreements and escalate tensions. The bombing of Iran’s nuclear facilities amid Tehran’s preparations for the sixth round of negotiations, along with open support for the Zionist regime’s acts of aggression, are tangible examples of such contradictions. Despite all this, Iran has consistently expressed readiness for constructive dialogue and engagement, but U.S. hostile actions have effectively blocked the diplomatic path.