News ID : 52093
Publish Date : 7/12/2020 11:48:28 PM
Saving Trump from the fall of 2020 with the wrong negotiation address / Natanz incident and devising strategies not to implement it!

Exclusive BY NOURNEWS;

Saving Trump from the fall of 2020 with the wrong negotiation address / Natanz incident and devising strategies not to implement it!

Over the past ten days, in addition to creating a mainstream media outlet affiliated with the domination system, dozens of reports, articles, interviews, etc. were produced and published by Western and Hebrew think tanks to prove the reality of the US and Israeli threats against Iran. Provides a comprehensive and coordinated program to intimidate public opinion and influence the decision-making structure of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

NOURNEWS - From the beginning of the incident in an equipped shed in the Shahid Ahmadi Roshan nuclear complex (Natanz), some media and personalities related to the Zionist regime tried to reinforce the suspicion that the incident was planned and directed by the regime.
The speculation escalated to the point that Reuters quoted some informed domestic sources! Never named, he claimed Israeli cyber-attacks on the Natanz nuclear facility.
However, none of the Israeli officials refused to accept this responsibility or even comment directly on it.
This media operation, as it was unprecedented in other cases, tried to influence the public opinion inside Iran with the focus of the "display of power" of the Zionist regime, rather than containing accurate information, with the techniques of psychological warfare.
Following the widespread psychological warfare, the New York Times recently wrote in a report: "An American-Israeli strategy is taking shape, something like a series of underground attacks aimed at senior Revolutionary Guards commanders and disrupting Iran's nuclear facilities. »
The New York Times, co-authored by David Sanger, Ronnen Bergman and Eric Schmidt, quotes two unnamed intelligence officials as examining various theories as to why the incident occurred, in terms of the complexity of the Stuxent cyberattack. "The main theory is that an explosive device has been planted at the Nazanz facility," he wrote.
On the other hand; In the wake of this widespread media propaganda, Benjamin Netanyahu tried to leave out the option of imminent security crises, including Iran's retaliation against Israel, by extending Yossi Cohen as Mossad chief for six months without commenting specifically on the Natanz incident. It has forced Tel Aviv to strengthen its offensive and defense systems.
After making this decision, the Zionist regime, by creating a new news stream with the help of the BBC, raised the issue of discovering and neutralizing Iran's plan to attack its embassies in different countries, but due to its imaginary and unbelievable dimensions, it was considered and accepted. The media was not covered and did not become a news wave.
In this regard; The launch of the Israeli military satellite, which was carried out through extensive propaganda, was another step taken to complete the regime's chain of psychological operations, in line with its stated goals of strengthening the monitoring and intelligence gathering system, especially on Iran.
Meanwhile, about two days ago, the Israeli media reported that in the midst of the regime's intense tension with Iran after the incident at the Natanz nuclear site, Israel has asked the United States to accelerate hand over Pegasus Casey 46 aircraft that are used for refueling in the air to the army.
The important point about the puzzle that the New York Times report is trying to complete by unveiling the joint Israeli-American strategy of assassinating IRGC commanders and striking at nuclear facilities is that; The Islamic Republic of Iran is in a special situation and if it makes a mistake, it will face unexpected reactions from Israel and the United States.
In the last ten days, in addition to creating a mainstream media environment affiliated with the domination system, dozens of reports, articles, interviews, etc. have been produced and published by Western and Hebrew think tanks and study centers to prove the reality of these threats, which show a comprehensive and coordinated program. To intimidate public opinion and influence the decision-making structure in the Islamic Republic of Iran.
The claim of Gen. Frank Kent Mackenzie, the commander of the CENTCOM terrorists, about Iran's passivity after the martyrdom of Major General Soleimani and the remarks of Brian Hook, the head of the Iranian case in the White House, about the possibility of Iran negotiating with the United States can be evaluated in this regard.
Mackenzie said in a telephone interview with Bloomberg on Friday; The decision-making capacity of the Islamic Republic of Iran has been "disturbed" after the assassination of Sardar Soleimani. Iran knows that in the field of action, we have the ability to make direct or indirect attacks on us or our partners or allies very painful for them.
"Iran should not miss the opportunity to negotiate with the United States, otherwise the situation will become more complicated than it is now," said Brian Hook, claiming that maximum pressure had been put on Iran.
Unfortunately, the extensive psychological operations of the United States and the Zionist regime have also affected some currents and related media inside, and based on this, they make continuous recommendations on the need to take a gentle approach towards the enemies in order to prevent them from making excuses.
There is no doubt that adopting a passive strategy against the enemy will not only reduce their offensive approach, but also advance the other side and provide a good ground for further propaganda of Israel and Trump in the run-up to the US elections that they will succeed in controlling Iran.


according to this; Even if the United States and the Zionist regime have plans according to the New York Times report, as long as they publish its characteristics and coordinates, it will mean that they seek to have a psychological impact on public opinion, rather than being able to carry out such plans. To describe precisely; It is clear that the US and Israeli psychological pressure vectors are being pursued with the aim of intimidating Iran.
Brian Hook's repeated plan of military and security plans to deal with Iran, along with opening the deadlock of negotiations, is a continuation of the US path in the context of a "perceptual war" against Iran to achieve "low-cost success." Trump is not in a position to change many of his problems with Netanyahu's performances and complex and costly media schemes.
The undeniable fact is that in the run-up to the US presidential election, Trump's position has been severely shaken by his irrational decisions and actions over the past four years, and it is very difficult to repair this situation.
It will not be long before the United States and the Zionist regime realize that not only will the developments in the region not work in their favor, but they will have to incur heavy costs to get out of the situation they have created by adopting evil approaches.
 


NOURNEWS
Comments

first name & last name

email

comment