News ID : 140438
Publish Date : 5/31/2023 7:02:44 PM
The West is still under the illusion of mastery over the world!

Exclusive

The West is still under the illusion of mastery over the world!

The West claims that no country has the right to an independent and impartial approach in the world and should only be subject to the behavior of the West, in such a way that wherever the West wants war, it will be on the side of the West, and if it needs peace for its interests, the way is to remain silent and refrain from protesting. the West wants the other countries to adopt the behavior of the West.

NOURNEWS - The G7 summit with the participation of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Great Britain and the United States was held in Hiroshima while Biden's failure to apologize to the Japanese people for the nuclear bombing of this city and Nagasaki showed that the West still adheres to the non-peaceful nuclear doctrine. Insists and does not accept any moral principles in this field.

Interestingly, Japan had claimed that the presence of the leaders of the Group of Seven in Hiroshima as a symbol of the victims of the use of the nuclear bomb means that these countries adhere to the principles of prohibiting the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear weapons!

In addition to this and the issues discussed about the Ukraine issue, focusing on the continuation of the war, the behavior of the Group of Seven towards China also showed that the Westerners still live in the illusion of mastery over the world.

Although the members of this meeting claimed in the final statement that they were ready to establish a constructive and stable relationship with China and considered it necessary to maintain a constructive relationship and interaction with Beijing, but the practical behavior of the Western countries expressed the truth behind this claim.

First; The presence of EU Council President Charles Michel, South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol, officials of Australia, Qamar Islands, Cook Islands, India, Indonesia and Vietnam in this meeting as pieces of the West's anti-Chinese puzzle, was practically a form of support against Beijing.

The combinations of this meeting, such as the American circle and some European partners in the form of bilateral and multilateral relations, such as the Akos agreement to build a nuclear submarine and strengthen convergence in the Pacific Ocean and the China Sea, practically showed a purposeful design to increase pressure against Beijing.

Second; The positions proposed in the final statement of the summit also clearly indicated this confrontational approach, which of course was accompanied by Beijing's reaction.

The Chinese Foreign Ministry released a statement while accusing the G7 countries of supporting Taiwan separatism, saying that they did not mention any opposition to the separatist forces in this island in their statements.

According to this statement: "The Group of 7 continues to make statements about maintaining peace in the Taiwan Strait, but does not indicate its opposition to Taiwan's independence, which basically means supporting the separatist forces on the island."

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China stated that the solution to the Taiwan issue is related to the Chinese people and should be decided by them, saying: "No one should underestimate the determination, unwavering will and vast ability of the Chinese people to defend the sovereignty of the state and territorial integrity. »

Third; The practical behavior and speaking positions of the participants in the meeting, along with what was done by the West during the days before the meeting, reveal another dimension of the aggressive approach of Europe and America against Beijing.

British Prime Minister said in his words: "China is the greatest challenge of the current era for the security and prosperity of the world."

Before him, "Liz Truss", who was the Prime Minister of England before Sunak, went on a threatening trip to Taiwan.

On the other hand, the President of the United States in a news conference in Hiroshima, in a warning tone, threatened China that if it takes unilateral action against Taiwan, it will face the reaction of the US.

"Joe Biden" told reporters with a strong support for Taiwan against China: "We continue to support Taiwan's ability to defend itself, and there is a clear understanding among our allies that if China acts one-sidedly, Beijing will face the consequences of its actions. And this action will have an answer."

Simultaneously with these statements and the meeting of the G7, the Ministry of Defense of the island of Taiwan announced on Saturday the holding of an exercise under the supervision of American generals with the aim of simulating possible attacks by the Chinese army on the island.

It is noteworthy that in a completely provocative action against the interests of China and of course Russia, French President Emmanuel Macron made a short and a symbolic trip to Mongolia. This is the first visit of the French president to the country between China and Russia.

All of these behaviors against China contain a key point, and that is the West's insistence on changing China's behavior towards the Ukraine war.

Beijing has always tried to play a role as an independent actor and mediator of peace, as "Xi Jinping" talked to both "Vladimir Putin" and "Volodymyr Zelenskyy", the presidents of Russia and Ukraine, and presented a 12-segmented plan for peace.

This interactive approach has been taken by Beijing, while the type of reaction of the West to this mediation and China's neutral approach is a lot to think about.

"Josep Borrell", The head of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, said; The union's relations with China will not develop until Beijing forces Russia to withdraw from Ukraine.

The complementary ring of Burrell's words can be seen in the positions of German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock, who claimed to her Chinese counterpart; Neutrality in the Ukraine war is tantamount to taking Russia's side and creating more pressure to end the conflict

In a press conference in Berlin with Chinese Foreign Minister Qin Gang, she said: Neutrality means siding with the aggressor, and for this reason, our guiding principle is to make it clear that we are on the side of the victim.

This sentence of the German Foreign Minister is the key to the behavior of the West in the G7 meeting towards China and other global developments, and shows the main nature of the West in interaction and confrontation with other countries, even those that mediate in solving crises.

Baerbock's words show that the West only accepts a point of view that is in line with its will, otherwise it considers neutrality to be an enemy to itself.

To be more precise; The West claims that no country has the right to an independent and impartial approach in the world and should only be subject to the behavior of the West, in such a way that wherever the West wants war, it will be on the side of the West, and if it needs peace for its interests, the way is to remain silent and refrain from protesting.

BY: Mohammad Ghaderi


NOURNEWS
Comments

first name & last name

email

comment