Confusion in the spiders net; Who is the real audience of Robert Malley's positions?
A simple decoding of Robert Malley's statements shows that the audience of his words is not Tehran and not even the three European countries, but the Zionist regime and Netanyahu's fragmented and vulnerable cabinet.
NOURNEWS - "Robert Malley", the US special representative for Iran affairs, said in a conversation with the BBC's "Hard Talk" program: "Diplomacy never ends even when we are engaged in other actions!"
In this conversation, he pointed out points worth considering in the field of Washington's JCPOA policy: "We had indirect negotiations with Iran and publicly announced that we are ready to continue indirect negotiations... We are not looking for regime change in Iran!"
A simple decoding of Robert Mali's statements shows that the audience of his words is not Tehran and not even the three European countries, but the Zionist occupation regime and Netanyahu's fragmented and vulnerable cabinet.
Regarding the events that happened in Tel Aviv and the reflection of these events in Washington's JCPOA positions, there are important points that cannot be easily ignored:
First of all; The return of Benjamin Netanyahu to the seat of power in the occupied territories has been the source of persistent crises and as a result, the increase in the internal, security and regional vulnerability of the Zionist regime.
In such a situation, the danger of the White House playing on Tel Aviv's ground has increased, and Netanyahu is also considered a troublesome and unreliable actor for the United States in the eyes of the Democrats and Joe Biden himself.
The intensification of internal crises, the confrontation between power institutions in the occupied territories, the splitting of the Zionist society in Haifa and Tel Aviv based on the opposition or support of Netanyahu's cabinet, the increase in the power of resistance in response to the attacks of the Zionist regime, and the unification of the anti-Zionist discourse and actions of the Palestinians in the West Bank. West Bank and the Gaza Strip have practically left no room for the minimal breathing of this illegitimate regime.
In this kind of circumstances; Accompanying the White House with the decisions and even positions of the Zionists only costs money for them and nothing else!
Although the White House officials, during the first weeks of Netanyahu's return to power, tried to hide the truth called "the inability of the United States to take risks in supporting Netanyahu's cabinet" in their statements and only emphasize Washington's approach in strategic alliance with Tel Aviv. But in recent days, it has become impossible for the likes of Blinken, Robert Malley and Jake Sullivan to continue this appearance.
The point is; At least part of the root of this hopeless view of the Americans towards the current events in the occupied territories has shown itself in the negotiations to lift the sanctions on Iran and the insistence of the White House to continue this process.
Secondly; Before the intensification of all-round crises and the strengthening of political-security faults in the occupied territories, the American authorities put the distinction between their overt and covert diplomacy towards Iran and the negotiations to revive the JCPOA on the agenda, but now it is possible for Washington to lead this double game to a large extent. It has become difficult.
In return; The American authorities have preferred to inevitably transform their dual tactical system towards the JCPOA (which they created after the riots), and part of this unwanted but forced transformation is aimed at sending direct or even indirect messages to the occupation regime of Al-Quds.
Accordingly; The main audience of Robert Mali's recent words are Netanyahu and his cabinet, and the nature of this message is not just a declaration of positions, but a warning to the Zionists, in the sense that the hands of the United States will be used to support the demands and tactics of Tel Aviv (both in the field of the JCPOA and (regional) in the face of Iran, has become much more closed than before and the Zionists should also accept this realistic calculation of the White House.
Thirdly, Robert Malley's recent words clearly indicate the US's admission of the failure of the "destabilization of Iran" project, which if the officials of the White House used to present this position in their secret advisory circles as a "hypothesis", now it is in the form of a "hypothesis". "Definite Proposition".
It is obvious that this confession is bitter for the American authorities and sweet for the heroic system and nation, which, in the 44th dawn of the revolution, subdued its enemies with its "active resistance" strategy and is an example of another victory.
BY: Mohammad Ghaderi
NOUNEWS