NOURNEWS - After the publication of articles about the 25-year joint strategic roadmap between Iran and China, many rumors and lies were published in the country's media, which were mainly of external origin. Meanwhile, dissident media and expatriate monarchist groups also tried to exploit the conditions created to provoke public opinion by waving and purposeful atmosphere.
Over the past few days, this media space has occupied a large volume of production and publication of false, unrealistic and directional content by using the method of psychological operations of "inversion" with the aim of "perceiving" in the public opinion inside the country.
Among the axes that were used to create a space using the Goebbels technique of "Big Lie" are: the surrender of Kish Island to the Chinese, the monopoly of investment in energy, petrochemical and transportation projects, the entry of 5,000 Chinese troops into the country, special privileges on monetary-banking and, most importantly, the secrecy of the drafting process.
lthough this issue has been covered from different angles in the country's media in recent days, but there are new angles that we will mention in this report:
The first point; What was wrongly and deliberately published by the dissenting media as a "contract" for long-term cooperation between Iran and China in public opinion is not true, because what has actually been written so far is a draft "roadmap" for strategic cooperation between two countries.
This point is important because we know that in the custom of international treaties and agreements, the word "contract" has a specific legal meaning, which means "approval" of the text in parliament and turning it into law, while in this case the parties have not yet entered those stages.
Second point; The "confidentiality" of this document is meant to be read in the context of a "contract", while for a variety of reasons, the details of each roadmap are usually similar to what happened between Iran and China until it was finalized for referring to parliament, but when it is approved and implemented, of course, a public announcement is made.
Third point; In the context of the lies attributed to this document, pro-Western groups and dissident currents seeking to profit from the country's continued dependence on Europe and the United States sought to insinuate that Iran had somehow sold itself to China out of fear of the West, becoming a colony of this country.
There are a few things to consider in this regard:
A) Iran, as an undisputed regional power, is an effective player in international relations and has a clear and institutionalized position in this field, so such an assessment is not logically true and the strategy of independence from the East and West is still a living and active strategy in foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
B) Contrary to the historical behavior and approach of the West towards Iran, which has always been imbued with colonial temperament and will, there is basically no such record from a country like China about Iran, and any bilateral relations, both cross-sectional and strategic, between the two countries are always on the bed of mutual benefit, has been based on mutual respect and maintaining the independence of both parties.
C) The drafting of a strategic cooperation document between Iran and China, although it does not mean complete cut of in relations with other countries in the world, but it certainly means preferring a reliable and honest partner to Western partners, who are always deceived, negligent.
D) Although in the eyes of Westernophils and overthrowers and monarchists abroad, the United States and its European vassals, are still the undisputed powers of the world, statistics in all areas clearly show the invalidity of this idea and the decline of Western hegemony, and therefore reason and logic rule. A wise and powerful actor like Iran should strengthen its relations not with shaky and deceitful powers but with a reliable power like China.
Fourth point; The activation of the monarchist and subversive currents with the help of the media empire of the domination system in this case, rather than showing the amount of their nationalism, reminds the public, their betrayals of the Iranian nation compared to the Islamic Republic.
More precisely; The atmosphere of the enemies of this nation and accusing the Islamic Republic is taking place while the historical memory of the Iranians in the face of the bravery of their sons in the Islamic Revolution and donating more than 250,000 red tulips ( martyars ) in defense of the privacy and territorial integrity of this border, will never forget Pahlavid dynasty's betrayal to their land, of which only a small example was crystallized in the Bahrain issue, or their treacherous pleas and those of other counter-revolutionary elements to US presidents to tighten sanctions.
The "big lie" of Iran's transfer to China shook Goebbels
The media coverage of the "Iran-China Strategic Partnership Roadmap" over the past few days, using the "inversion" method of psychological operations and focusing on the "big lie" technique, failed to achieve the original goal of "perception" in public opinion.
Nornews - Political Group: After the publication of articles about the 25-year joint strategic roadmap between Iran and China, many rumors and lies were published in the country's media, which were mainly of external origin. Meanwhile, dissident media and expatriate monarchist groups also tried to exploit the conditions created to provoke public opinion by waving and purposeful atmosphere.
Over the past few days, this media space has occupied a large volume of production and publication of false, unrealistic and directional content by using the method of psychological operations of "inversion" with the aim of "perceiving" in the public opinion inside the country.
Among the axes that were used to create a space using the Goebbels technique of "Big Lie" are: the transfer of Kish Island to the Chinese, the monopoly of investment in energy, petrochemical and transportation projects, the entry of 5,000 Chinese troops into the country, special privileges. He mentioned the monetary-banking and, most importantly, the secrecy of the drafting process.
Although this issue has been covered from different angles in the country's media in recent days, but there are new angles that we will mention in this report:
The first point; What was wrongly and deliberately published by the dissenting media as a "contract" for long-term cooperation between Iran and China in public opinion is not true, because what has actually been written so far is a draft "roadmap" for strategic cooperation between the two Is the country.
This point is important because we know that in the custom of international treaties and agreements, the word "contract" has a specific legal meaning, which means "approval" of the text in parliament and turning it into law, while in this case the parties They have not yet entered those stages.
Second point; The "confidentiality" of this document is meant to be read in the context of a "contract", while for a variety of reasons, the details of each roadmap are usually similar to what happened between Iran and China until it was finalized for reference. Parliament does not become a media outlet, but when it is approved and implemented, of course, a public announcement is made.
Third point; In the context of the lies attributed to this document, pro-Western groups and dissident currents seeking to profit from the country's continued dependence on Europe and the United States sought to insinuate that Iran had somehow sold itself to China out of fear of the West. It has become a colony of this country. There are a few things to consider in this regard:
A) Iran, as an undisputed regional power, is an effective player in international relations and has a clear and institutionalized position in this field, so such an assessment is not logically local to the Arabs and the strategy of independence from the East and West is still a living and active strategy in politics. Is a foreigner of the Islamic Republic.
B) Contrary to the historical behavior and approach of the West towards Iran, which has always been imbued with colonial temperament and will, there is basically no such record from a country like China about Iran, and any bilateral relations, both cross-sectional and strategic, between the two countries are always on the bed. Mutual benefit has been based on mutual respect and maintaining the independence of both parties.
C) The drafting of a strategic cooperation document between Iran and China, although it does not mean that it does not have relations with other countries in the world, but it certainly means preferring a reliable and honest partner to its Western partners, who are always deceived, negligent and look down on Paine has demanded absolute dependence on Iran.
D. Although in the eyes of patriotic Westerners and overthrowers and monarchists abroad, the United States and its European satellites are still the undisputed powers of the world, statistics in all areas clearly show the invalidity of this idea and the decline of Western hegemony, and therefore reason and logic rule. A wise and powerful actor like Iran should strengthen his relations not with shaky and deceitful powers but with a reliable power like China.
Fourth point; The activation of the monarchist and subversive patriotic currents with the help of the media empire of the domination system in this case, rather than showing the sweat of their nationalism, reminds the public of their betrayals of the Iranian nation compared to the Islamic Republic.
More precisely; The atmosphere of the enemies of this nation and accusing the Islamic Republic is taking place while the historical memory of the Iranians in the face of the bravery of the sons of Jan on the floor of the Islamic Revolution and donating more than 250,000 red tulips in defense of the privacy and territorial integrity of this border is never a betrayal Pahlavi will not forget the waste of this land and water, of which only a small example was crystallized in the Bahrain issue, or their treacherous pleas and those of other counter-revolutionary elements to US presidents to tighten sanctions.
Finally; It is natural that the US-led hegemonic system and its European vassals, which for the past 42 years have not been able to overthrow this popular system in spite of any intrigue and hostility, will today be ostracized by such a document, which, if implemented, would impose oppressive sanctions making them ineffective as the last blind to the hope of regime change in Iran, and it will also put them in a lot of trouble in the fight against a powerful rival such as China, which has chosen long-term strategic cooperation with the Islamic Republic of Iran.
NOURNEWS