nournews - The traces of the media attachment and the use of various tactics to induce superior military and intelligence power in the war with Iran can be seen in the main approaches of the Natanz disaster.
By using all the mechanisms of psychological warfare in the field of media perception, the Zionist regime is trying to create a two-sided view in the public mind and to shape public opinion.
The perceptive words of the Zionists to the statistical community of the various masses of the people show the very high fear of these international terrorists of their role being revealed in recent events.
The Zionist rhetoric in the informal diplomacy of the media appendix The recent events and sabotage, especially the Natanz tragedy, can be analyzed in various dimensions.
Security analysts are well aware of the two major weaknesses of the regime, namely the Dimona nuclear complex and the Zionist regime's ammonia tanks, and know that in the event of any serious security tension between Iran and the Zionist regime, the destruction of these two centers is in fact political and social life. More than three million people could end up, and basically this regime was promised much earlier than twenty-five years; Leave it to the trash to history, which is why we see the Mossad media attachment with very high power in the media scene trying to show a two-pronged cut from recent events.
Haaretz and other Zionist-affiliated media outlets, on the one hand, do not formally take responsibility for the recent events in Iran, including the Natanz tragedy and the recent fires, and on the other hand, by justifying their affiliated media and perceiving them for the audience. And the intellectual domination of the minds of their audiences is trying to suggest that recent events have been the responsibility of Mossad.
The Zionist regime, which has a history of the Stuxnet virus and challenging Iran's peaceful nuclear program, has entered into the current challenge of recent events with a media appendix in four separate headlines for the audience of the disaster. The four topics of the statistical community are:
1. Supporters of the Zionist regime in Iran and other parts of the world
2. People from the gray masses of society who are completely confused and do not know exactly what happened.
3. People who are looking for a reciprocal response from Iran.
4. Encouraging the masses in the field of media to unofficially announce in the field of media that the Natanz incident was the work of this regime!
In fact, the Zionist regime, fearing the consequences of what happened, is trying to insinuate through its media that the recent events were the work of this regime, but in the public arena of international diplomacy, it is afraid that by announcing its official opinion. , To see with his own eyes the very bad consequences, such as the destruction of his ammonia tanks or Dimona nuclear complex by a newly formed group, without any hindrance from the axis of resistance.
Therefore, considering the issues raised, we see that the position of the Supreme National Security Council of Iran is in fact a completely professional behavior in the field of public diplomacy, which, given that all angles of the Natanz incident are well clarified, but the right to a definite answer depends on To the official behavior of the Zionist regime; Because this regime must have terrible consequences for taking responsibility for what it has done.
*PhD in Media Management, Middle East Political analyst
NOURNEWS