NOURNEWS - More than three days after the incident on the morning of Thursday, July 3, at the Shahid Ahmadi Roshan Nuclear Complex (Natanz), during which part of the shed due to the assembly of new generation centrifuges, was damaged news and reports about this incident still continue focused on domestic, regional and international media.
Regardless of the formal nature of the incident, the issue that has kept the news going is its connection to the "nuclear facility."
Although the accident took place at a significant distance from uranium enrichment facilities and, according to officials from the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran and the International Atomic Energy Agency, the incident was not accompanied by uranium leaks, but the formation of an event in a nuclear complex is enough to "create sensitivity and attract global attention."
In line with the international sensitivities surrounding the incident, speculation about the reasons for its occurrence remains a major issue for the media.
From the first hours of the incident, and even before that, some media outlets, mostly affiliated with the Zionist regime, began reporting on Israel's involvement in the incident, and various statements such as the airstrikes on the complex by F16 and F35 fighters, carring special operations out, industrial sabotage, etc. with the theme of "empowering" the Zionist regime broadcasted.
Although the Israeli and Western media have been active since the beginning of the incident, covering the news and analysis of the incident and linking it to Israel's intelligence and operational capabilities, the regime's officials have taken a completely different approach.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declined to comment on the regime's involvement in the Natanz incident, saying only "we cannot have a clear statement on the matter."
"Iran, with its nuclear capability, is what we cannot allow to happen," Israeli Defense Minister Benny Gantz told army radio,and added "We are preventing Iran from nuclear developmen by doing whatever is necessary."
"Atomic Iran is a threat to us, but it should not be linked to anything," Gantz said in response to a question about Israel's involvement in a series of recent bombings at Iran's nuclear site.
Israeli Foreign Minister Gabi Ashkenazi said in a similar statement today in response to last week's incident on the Natanz nuclear site: "Israel is taking steps to stop the Iranian nuclear threat; "But it is better for the regime's actions against Iran to go unnoticed."
The Islamic Republic of Iran, however, has so far, in addition to providing clear information about the incident, preferred to postpone stating its cause to the future for security reasons.
Behrouz Kamalvandi, spokesman for the Atomic Energy Organization, announced the incident a few hours after it happened, but left a comment on the cause of the accident to Keyvan Khosravi, spokesman for the Secretariat of the Supreme National Security Council, who only commented on specific national security issues that could have "different messages."
Khosravi announced on Friday afternoon, one day after the incident: The main cause of the accident has been determined, but due to some security considerations, the reasons will be announced at the appropriate time.
Naturally, last Thursday's incident at the Natanz nuclear site, regardless of the extent of its limited damage to Iran, was of "strategic importance" and examining the causes of the incident and "taking the necessary measures" to prevent a recurrence of similar incidents follows " Strategic decisions " norms.
Undoubtedly, Iran's decision to postpone announcing what will happen in the future should be considered and evaluated from the point of view of the time required to make strategic decisions.
NOURNEWS